IT`S about time more light was shed on the critical Arsalan
Iftikhar-Malik Riaz scandal, and there is some hope that Shoaib Suddle`s
investigation into it might do so. The federal tax ombudsman is a man
known for his competence and integrity, and from that point of view the
Supreme Court`s choice of him to pick up the investigation is a smart
one. But his appointment, and the developments that led to it, also
highlight the potential conflicts of interest involved in this case, one
that pits one of the country`s most influential businessmen against the
son of the country`s most influential judge.
From the very
beginning it was clear that the case would be a test of the judiciary`s
impartiality. But the complete dissolution of a joint investigation team
that was looking into the matter, and the appointment of a one-man
commission instead, are both unusual developments.
They also set a
dangerous precedent. The JIT consisted of officials from NAB, the FIA
and Islamabad police, and while there is some circumstantial evi-dence
that some of the officials involved in it may have been close to Malik
Riaz, its disbanding opens the door for others under investigation in
the future to refuse to comply by claiming that state agencies carrying
out probes are biased. As an alternative, some officials on the team
could have been replaced rather than dissolving it altogether. Also, Mr
Suddle will need the assistance of the agencies that were represented on
the JIT, and perhaps some of the individuals themselves, and the SC has
ordered that the evidence collected by the JIT be handed over to him.
So if this is a cosmetic change to some degree, that too raises the
question of why the court would go to such lengths to respond to Arsalan
Iftikhar`s objections. Ultimately, the crux of the matter is that this
is no ordinary case. More than in other instances, the SC needs to
demonstrate that justice has been done.
What this saga now needs
is a speedy, impartial conclusion, so that any lingering questions about
corruption tainting the superior judiciary can be put to rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment