THE untapped gold and copper deposits at Reko Dig are in the news again,
with more of the same further delays. The dispute at the moment is over
which lawyers will hear the case in international arbitration. But this
is only the latest obstacle in a standoff between a foreign mining
company and the Balochistan government that flared up a year and a half
ago over the reportedly massive deposits in the province. And it has
been nearly two decades since an exploration agreement was first signed
that could by now have helped transform Balochistan`s fortunes. Now
stuck in both the Supreme Court and in international arbitration, the
disagreement shows no signs of being resolved while the province relies
on handouts from the federal government and languishes for lack of
development.
Each side offers a series of arguments against the
other. Tethyan Copper claims the 1993 agreement includes a generous
pay-off for the provincial government and that there was no valid reason
to deny them a mining license after they invested more than $200m in
exploration. Balochistanclaims the agreement offers no real financial
benefit for the province and did not guarantee a mining license, and
that the company has failed to begin mining for years. Lost in all of
this is the bigger picture.
For one, although various speculative
figures are thrown around by people on both sides of the debate who
undervalue or overvalue the deposits depending on their motivations,
Reko Dig is a substantial deposit by global standards. The Balochistan
government needs to get realistic about whether it has the means or the
expertise to tap into this badly needed source of revenue. Second, the
matter goes beyond Reko Diq.
Foreign direct investment has been
falling for the last four years, including by 50 per cent in 2011-12. If
this case becomes yet another example of Pakistani economic policies
and contracts changing depending on the government in power, that will
only further damage the country`s reputation as an investment
destination. It is worth trying to put nationalist rhetoric aside and
reshape the agreement rather than necessarily throwing it out
altogether.
No comments:
Post a Comment